That's right. Should the world as we know it persist just because it was "first"?
[Sure he wants to bring things back to how they were before God - a bloody, violent society - but one that would be pure change. Built on merits and the fairness of nature, not artificial structures and heirarchies masquerading as the natural order.
Change is good. A constant, evolving world - not one of stangation.]
That ideas are tried, tested, modified or even discarded when they no longer work, if ever they did - it's a fine perspective to have. Many are too comfortable with what they've always known to think how you do.
[He gestures to the arm.]
Even that is proof of your beliefs. If every part were eventually worn and replaced, would it be the same arm? It does not matter, because it would inherit the spirit of the original. It would function just as it always had and it would continue to do so, because it too changed.
no subject
[Sure he wants to bring things back to how they were before God - a bloody, violent society - but one that would be pure change. Built on merits and the fairness of nature, not artificial structures and heirarchies masquerading as the natural order.
Change is good. A constant, evolving world - not one of stangation.]
That ideas are tried, tested, modified or even discarded when they no longer work, if ever they did - it's a fine perspective to have. Many are too comfortable with what they've always known to think how you do.
[He gestures to the arm.]
Even that is proof of your beliefs. If every part were eventually worn and replaced, would it be the same arm? It does not matter, because it would inherit the spirit of the original. It would function just as it always had and it would continue to do so, because it too changed.